IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v13y2012i1p65-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scope of Six Sigma in Indian foundry operations: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Bikram Jit Singh
  • Dinesh Khanduja

Abstract

This study emphasises on the immediate need of high operation performances in foundries by uncovering some feeble production metrics of Indian foundries. Where it discusses versatile challenges before foundries in India there it also highlights some advantages of Indian scenario as far as scope of productivity enhancement through Six Sigma is concerned. It also summarises some tools under various phases of Six Sigma that may be more effective and efficient for foundry environments of this sub continent. Six Sigma's DMAIC methodology has been used to reduce the defect rate among existing operations. Doing things right in first time and keeping them consistently is the only idea behind Six Sigma. An empirical investigation has been carried out in a make-to-order (medium-sized) foundry to demystified Six Sigma among Indians by showing its compatibility with Indian foundry SMEs also. Six Sigma has been implemented to decrease the scrap (or defects) from a two wheeler's piston castings by 15.02% appreciably. It is one of a rare but successful Six Sigma pilot study that uses response surface methodology as an optimisation technique, among Indian die casting foundries.

Suggested Citation

  • Bikram Jit Singh & Dinesh Khanduja, 2012. "Scope of Six Sigma in Indian foundry operations: a case study," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 65-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:13:y:2012:i:1:p:65-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=48276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:13:y:2012:i:1:p:65-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.