IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v10y2011i4p467-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace productivity and managerial support issues associated with March Madness

Author

Listed:
  • Amber A. Smith
  • Alan D. Smith
  • O. Felix Offodile

Abstract

A review of the applied literature on sports-related gambling and bracketing that is quite widespread in the USA and other countries was provided. A sample consisted of relatively well-paid, professionals who many routinely engage in office pools and most universally are involved in bracketing March Madness plays, resulting in 145 useable questionnaires recording responses to 28 variables from an initial sampling frame of slightly over 200 potential respondents associated with a major Pittsburgh-based financial service provider. Multivariate statistical analyses were used to test several hypotheses. It was found that management appears to be successfully delivering the message that office gambling activities harms productivity if management activity discourages office gambling, but there appears to be a trade-off as labour productivity may be slightly reduced on the short term and employee cohesiveness may increase on the long term. It was also found that the degree of personal involvement is important, the more an employee is involved, and the more of an impact that March Madness activities will have a negative impact on his/her productivity. However, these negative concerns may be mediated with increased employee cohesiveness and morale.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber A. Smith & Alan D. Smith & O. Felix Offodile, 2011. "Workplace productivity and managerial support issues associated with March Madness," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 467-499.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:10:y:2011:i:4:p:467-499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43467
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:10:y:2011:i:4:p:467-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.