IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v5y2011i2p140-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imprecise reliability assessment when the type of the probability distribution of the random variables is unknown

Author

Listed:
  • Efstratios Nikolaidis
  • Zissimos P. Mourelatos

Abstract

In reliability design, often, there is scarce data for constructing probabilistic models. It is particularly challenging to model uncertainty in variables when the type of their probability distributions is unknown. Moreover, it is expensive to estimate the upper and lower bounds of the reliability of a system involving such variables. A method for modelling uncertainty by using Polynomial Chaos Expansion is presented. The method requires specifying bounds for statistical summaries such as the first four moments and credible intervals. A constrained optimisation problem, in which decision variables are the coefficients of the Polynomial Chaos Expansion approximation, is formulated and solved in order to estimate the minimum and maximum values of a system's reliability. This problem is solved efficiently by employing probabilistic re-analysis to approximate the system reliability as a function of the moments of the random variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Efstratios Nikolaidis & Zissimos P. Mourelatos, 2011. "Imprecise reliability assessment when the type of the probability distribution of the random variables is unknown," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 140-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:140-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=39300
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:140-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.