IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v4y2010i2-3p206-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian methodology for crack identification in structures using strain measurements

Author

Listed:
  • S. Gaitanaros
  • G. Karaiskos
  • C. Papadimitriou
  • N. Aravas

Abstract

A Bayesian system identification methodology is presented for estimating the crack location, size and orientation in a structure using strain measurements. The Bayesian statistical approach combines information from measured data and analytical or computational models of structural behaviour to predict estimates of the crack characteristics along with the associated uncertainties, taking into account modelling and measurement errors. An optimal sensor location methodology is also proposed to maximise the information that is contained in the measured data for crack identification problems. For this, the most informative, about the condition of the structure, data are obtained by minimising the information entropy measure of the uncertainty in the crack parameter estimates. Both crack identification and optimal sensor location formulations lead to highly non-convex optimisation problems in which multiple local and global optima may exist. A hybrid optimisation method, based on evolutionary strategies and gradient-based techniques, is used to determine the global minima. The effectiveness of the proposed methodologies is illustrated using simulated data from a single crack in a thin plate subjected to static loading.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Gaitanaros & G. Karaiskos & C. Papadimitriou & N. Aravas, 2010. "A Bayesian methodology for crack identification in structures using strain measurements," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2/3), pages 206-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:4:y:2010:i:2/3:p:206-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=32446
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:4:y:2010:i:2/3:p:206-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.