IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v20y2026i3p237-266.html

A comparative analysis of neural network and ensemble learning models for automated root cause classification in fatal mine accident reports

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar Arra
  • Suprakash Gupta

Abstract

Mining is one of the highest-risk industries due to the hazardous nature of coal extraction, a primary power generation source. This study uses 1305 mining accident reports, recorded from 1995 to 2015 in India, to determine the root causes of accidents and devise effective safety measures. The methodology follows a structured approach combining expert domain knowledge with advanced natural language processing techniques. We employed a novel hybrid vectorisation strategy combining N-grams, TF-IDF and word embeddings to analyse accident reports. We used stratified 10-fold cross-validation to address the imbalanced data distribution. This study compared three machine learning models: CatBoost, XGBoost and neural networks. CatBoost demonstrated superior performance with a 0.91 F1-score and 0.98 PR-AUC, outperforming both XGBoost (0.88, 0.96) and neural networks (0.84, 0.93). The developed system predicts accident root causes with 91% accuracy, providing a robust framework for improved decision-making and enhanced industry safety standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar Arra & Suprakash Gupta, 2026. "A comparative analysis of neural network and ensemble learning models for automated root cause classification in fatal mine accident reports," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(3), pages 237-266.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:20:y:2026:i:3:p:237-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=155215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:20:y:2026:i:3:p:237-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.