IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrevm/v15y2025i1-2p48-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on classifying overinvestment by machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Tam Phan Huy

Abstract

This research delves into the prevalent issue of overinvestment in Vietnamese firms, employing a range of machine learning algorithms to classify such behaviour. The study utilises data from Vietnam's stock exchanges, applying a wide array of machine learning algorithms - ranging from Logistic Regression to complex deep learning architectures - to identify the most effective tool in classifying overinvestment. The findings from this study reveal that certain machine learning algorithms, particularly ensemble methods like AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost, demonstrate exceptional proficiency in classifying overinvestment scenarios among Vietnamese firms. These models outperform traditional statistical approaches by effectively capturing the complex, non-linear dynamics that characterise overinvestment behaviour. Notably, the research uncovers that AdaBoost and XGBoost are particularly adept in this context, offering high accuracy and robustness in detecting overinvestment patterns. The research concludes that these machine-learning tools are crucial for understanding and mitigating overinvestment risks, providing a significant analytical resource for Vietnam's financial sector. The study recommends further adoption of machine learning in corporate financial analysis to enhance decision-making and market stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Tam Phan Huy, 2025. "Comparative study on classifying overinvestment by machine learning," International Journal of Revenue Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1/2), pages 48-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrevm:v:15:y:2025:i:1/2:p:48-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=147361
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrevm:v:15:y:2025:i:1/2:p:48-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=99 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.