IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrevm/v12y2021i1-2p104-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unverifiable net assets ratio and annual report reading difficulty

Author

Listed:
  • Wray Bradley
  • Wen-Chyuan Chiang
  • Li Sun

Abstract

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has greatly expanded the use of fair value instruments, which amplifies an increase of unverifiable assets and liabilities that do not have actively traded market prices. Prior research indicates that managers may have strong incentives to use discretion in estimating fair values of such assets and liabilities for his/her self-serving interests, leading to more agency conflicts. This study examines the impact of unverifiable net assets on reading difficulty of annual reports. We predict that annual reports of firms with more unverifiable assets and liabilities are more difficult to read because prior research links agency conflicts to increased reading difficulty. Our results show a significant positive relation between unverifiable net assets and reading difficulty, consistent with the agency theory. Our study has implications for revenue management because prior research links earnings management to annual report readability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wray Bradley & Wen-Chyuan Chiang & Li Sun, 2021. "Unverifiable net assets ratio and annual report reading difficulty," International Journal of Revenue Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 104-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrevm:v:12:y:2021:i:1/2:p:104-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114968
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrevm:v:12:y:2021:i:1/2:p:104-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=99 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.