IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v6y2010i1-2p136-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What economists should know about public policymaking?

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Arestis
  • Yiannis Kitromilides

Abstract

Economists maintain that the study of public policymaking falls outside the scope of their discipline. How and why public policies are made should be studied by political science. Policy debates in economics take place within a generally agreed framework referred to in the paper as the 'optimisation paradigm'. There are two central assumptions: 1) there is a 'technocratic' relationship between economists and policymakers based on a separation of functions: policymakers provide the objectives of policy and economists the best instruments of policy; 2) public policymaking is and ought to be 'rational'. A detailed examination of both assumptions reveals that the optimisation paradigm has serious shortcomings. This conclusion is reinforced by the accounts of many economists who have had active involvement in public policymaking. The economist's policy paradigm is in need of revision, which will inevitably require a collective effort. We recommend a return to the 'political economy' approach in which economists will participate in policymaking as 'positive political economists' rather than technical experts 'divorced' from politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Arestis & Yiannis Kitromilides, 2010. "What economists should know about public policymaking?," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 136-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:6:y:2010:i:1/2:p:136-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=31211
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:6:y:2010:i:1/2:p:136-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.