Evaluating public sector intramural research programmes: the case of the US Advanced Technology Program's Intramural Research Initiative
Within a public environment in which accountability is at the forefront, an important evaluation question is how to document the economic value of innovation-related outputs and outcomes from intramural research relative to the cost of funding an intramural research programme. In this paper, we apply a counterfactual method to an evaluation of the US Advanced Technology Program's (ATP) Intramural Research Initiative. We also suggest more general applications of the methodology – for example, economic development applications to project evaluations in the developing areas of a country or in developing nations.
Volume (Year): 4 (2009)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:516-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.