IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v4y2009i3-4p251-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the governance of social science research: the replacement of profession with performance contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Mai S. Linneberg
  • Hanne Norreklit
  • Philipp J.H. Schroder

Abstract

The majority of social science research is conducted within public or semipublic institutions, such as universities. Over the past decades, these institutions have experienced substantial changes in governance structures and an increased focus on performance contracts. Obviously, the new structures do not enter into a governance vacuum, but replace the existing profession-based governance structures. The present paper has a twofold purpose. First, we map the key features and problems of a profession-based governance system, focusing on principal-agent issues and motivational drivers. Second, we study the implications of the current changes in the social science research landscape, along with the central aspects of mechanism design, validity and employee motivation, as well as the ability to establish socially optimal resource allocations. We identify a number of potential problems that may come along with the current changes in governance structures and suggest directions for alternative solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mai S. Linneberg & Hanne Norreklit & Philipp J.H. Schroder, 2009. "On the governance of social science research: the replacement of profession with performance contracts," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3/4), pages 251-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:4:y:2009:i:3/4:p:251-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=23491
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malmmose, Margit, 2015. "Management accounting versus medical profession discourse: Hegemony in a public health care debate – A case from Denmark," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 144-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:4:y:2009:i:3/4:p:251-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.