IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v9y2019i2p250-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big data and privacy - a legal perspective and comparative study of the USA and India

Author

Listed:
  • Rupal Rautdesai
  • Ujwal Nandekar
  • Aditya Kedari
  • Yogesh Patil

Abstract

Due to advancement of science and technology a new concept called big data has emerged. Its utility has attracted not only the private companies and organisations but also governmental authorities. But at the same time it has also raised certain ethical, moral and legal concerns. This paper looks at the threats to individuals privacy caused due to big data. This paper compares the US laws with Indian laws with respect to privacy and data protection and attempts to offer a solution to safeguard individuals' privacy against such threats. The research methodology used by the researchers is doctrinal method along with armchair, exploratory, analytical and comparative method. The authors argue that individuals' privacy can be safeguarded through a holistic approach wherein apt technology standards, management practices along with force of law are adopted. Companies and organisations should adopt self-regulating operating standards and practices too. The concept of privacy in this paper has been restricted to mean the individual privacy and does not include national security concerns or confidential data of corporations. The authors also suggest a framework for the protection of individual privacy and its implementation in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Rupal Rautdesai & Ujwal Nandekar & Aditya Kedari & Yogesh Patil, 2019. "Big data and privacy - a legal perspective and comparative study of the USA and India," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 250-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:250-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99334
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:250-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.