IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v8y2018i3p291-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A farmland choice based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic preferences relations

Author

Listed:
  • Nesrin Halouani
  • Sonia Hajlaoui

Abstract

A new type of fuzzy preference structure, called hesitant linguistic preference relations, is developed in order to describe uncertain evaluation information in group decision-making (GDM) farmland choice. Moreover, it allows decision makers to offer all possible linguistic terms that are not accounted for in current preference structure types when we compare two alternatives. Systematic aggregation operators are proposed to aggregate hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. In addition, an approach to GDM based on PROMETHEE method concepts and hesitant linguistic preference relations is developed to take into account the differences in opinions between individual decision makers. An agriculture real case study is implemented to demonstrate the practicability of the proposed method. Also, a sensitivity analysis is carried out to reveal the effect of the criteria weighting variations on the originally obtained ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Nesrin Halouani & Sonia Hajlaoui, 2018. "A farmland choice based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic preferences relations," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 291-317.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:291-317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92890
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:291-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.