IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v5y2015i2p133-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposing an approach for ranking manufacturing companies based on knowledge management process using fuzzy TOPSIS with a case study on the excellent brands of Isfahan province

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdieh Mazaheri
  • Arash Shahin
  • Hadi Shirouyehzad

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to elucidate how manufacturing companies can be prioritised based on knowledge management process. The indicators of knowledge management process have been investigated. The sample research includes 56 managers of 15 manufacturing excellent companies of Isfahan province in 2012. Fuzzy method has been used for ranking companies using the closeness to the ideal solution method (TOPSIS). Findings imply that Pars Power Transmission Equipment Company has the best rank regarding knowledge management process; and knowledge storage has the most effective, and knowledge capture has the least effective indicators in the knowledge management process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdieh Mazaheri & Arash Shahin & Hadi Shirouyehzad, 2015. "Proposing an approach for ranking manufacturing companies based on knowledge management process using fuzzy TOPSIS with a case study on the excellent brands of Isfahan province," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 133-155.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:133-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:133-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.