IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v24y2026i2p153-173.html

Educational innovations of higher education: a comparative analysis of Education 4.0 and Education 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Sonalika Sarangi
  • Dibyajyoti Ghosh

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth comparison of two evolving paradigms in higher education: Education 4.0 and Education 5.0. Education 4.0 integrates technology and digital tools with traditional teaching methods, while Education 5.0 emphasises a holistic, learner-centric approach that values adaptability, sustainability, and societal relevance. The research aims to explore the effects of these educational models on teaching and learning within higher education institutions. All articles are published between 2019 to 2024 and listed in the Scopus database. Comparative analysis is carried out using the 'biblioshiny' package on the 'R' studio and SPAR-4 protocol. The primary goal is to shed light on the shifting educational paradigms in the digital era and to analyse the most relevant authors and sources associated with Education 4.0 and Education 5.0. Key aspects under consideration include instructional methodologies, technological integration, curriculum development, student engagement, and overall educational outcomes. Amidst rapid technological advancements and societal changes, the results of this study will provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and institutions, aiding them in making well-informed decisions about the future trajectory of higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonalika Sarangi & Dibyajyoti Ghosh, 2026. "Educational innovations of higher education: a comparative analysis of Education 4.0 and Education 5.0," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(2), pages 153-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:24:y:2026:i:2:p:153-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=157117
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:24:y:2026:i:2:p:153-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.