IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v21y2025i4p499-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive power of ensemble learning in audit qualifications: insights from Indian firms

Author

Listed:
  • T. Shahana
  • Vilvanathan Lavanya
  • Aamir Rashid Bhat

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of ensemble learning methods – bagging, boosting, and stacking – in predicting audit qualifications among Indian firms. Traditional models often fall short because of the complexity of financial reporting data. To address these limitations, our research introduces a novel stacked model incorporating a meta-classifier and utilises a comprehensive dataset enriched with essential financial and non-financial metrics. We systematically compared the performance of seven different ensemble models with conventional classifiers. Our findings demonstrate that ensemble methods, especially our proposed stacking approach, significantly outperform standard models in key metrics such as recall, precision, and area under the curve (AUC). This study highlights the critical role of meticulous feature selection and model calibration in optimising predictive analytics. This research provides valuable insights for auditors, regulatory bodies, and policymakers, enhancing audit quality predictions and supporting financial reporting integrity in the Indian context.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Shahana & Vilvanathan Lavanya & Aamir Rashid Bhat, 2025. "Predictive power of ensemble learning in audit qualifications: insights from Indian firms," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 499-537.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:499-537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149981
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:499-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.