IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v1y2005i1p25-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-mapping strategic and quality processes: a best practice analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rodney McAdam
  • Denis Leonard

Abstract

Strategic processes in many organisations do not adequately incorporate or model the effects of quality processes. Rather, quality is treated as being part of operations as distinct from strategy. Similarly, many quality processes are introduced only at the "continuous improvement" level focusing on small-scale changes. Thus, it becomes difficult to develop and interrelate strategy and quality processes at the strategic level of inquiry. The aim of this paper is to explore the cross-mapping of strategic and quality processes to improve business strategy and Quality implementation in organisations. Using a best practice case, it is shown that quality processes must be recognised as being strategic in addition to being operationally focused. It is shown that quality processes, such as those involved in the Baldrige Model, the ISO 9000:2000 revisions, and the ISO 14000 Environmental Management System processes, can be effectively mapped into an organisation's strategic processes. The findings indicate that effective cross-mapping can lead to more grounded and effective business strategies and quality management effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodney McAdam & Denis Leonard, 2005. "Cross-mapping strategic and quality processes: a best practice analysis," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 25-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:1:y:2005:i:1:p:25-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:1:y:2005:i:1:p:25-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.