IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v16y2024i2p243-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking the lean manufacturing process of an auto component cluster using AHP-MOORA and AHP-TOPSIS technique

Author

Listed:
  • Anoop Pandey
  • Rohitashwa Shringi

Abstract

Monitoring the performance improvement and devising the mechanisms for attaining improvement are required for industrial clusters through benchmarking. An Indian auto component cluster is selected for benchmarking and modelling the benchmark's performance. Benchmarking is performed considering a problem of multi-criteria decision-making and tools like analytical hierarchy process (AHP), AHP - multi-objective optimisation using ratio analysis (MOORA), and AHP - technique of order preference similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) are used. The goal of the problem statement was to identify the best-in-class performer, among the participating units. The nine participating members formed the alternatives. The selection was based on the five criteria of LP, CP, ITR, OEE, and COPQ. Rankings were given to the nine alternatives using the three methods and the same alternative - SBSIPL emerged as the benchmark through all the methods. The mathematical model suggested that non-benchmarks should focus on reducing the ITR ad CP cost that has almost 80% of the total weightage to improve their performance like the benchmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Anoop Pandey & Rohitashwa Shringi, 2024. "Benchmarking the lean manufacturing process of an auto component cluster using AHP-MOORA and AHP-TOPSIS technique," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 243-261.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:243-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135761
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:243-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.