IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v13y2023i4p449-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating mobile wallet acceptance factors using best worst method

Author

Listed:
  • Ashwarya Kapoor
  • Rajiv Sindwani
  • Manisha Goel

Abstract

The aim of the present research is to propose a novel multi-criteria approach for assessment of mobile wallet (m-wallet) key acceptance factors. Six critical acceptance factors are identified through extensive literature review and discussion with an expert. A new important factor influencing acceptance of m-wallet called 'policy and regulatory measures' has been proposed by authors. This has resulted in total of seven key acceptance factors. A relatively new and efficacious multi-criteria decision-making technique named best worst method (BWM) has been applied to evaluate and rank the key acceptance factors. Sensitivity analysis has been conducted to examine the reliability of the study. Analysis revealed 'perceived security and trust' as the top most factor leading to acceptance of m-wallet among consumers. Examination of the literature indicates that this study is among the pioneer studies to prioritise key acceptance factors of m-wallet acceptance using BWM. The focus on key acceptance factors proposed in this study will help m-wallet service providers to improve their business processes. This will eventually help them to increase m-wallet acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashwarya Kapoor & Rajiv Sindwani & Manisha Goel, 2023. "Evaluating mobile wallet acceptance factors using best worst method," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 449-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:449-469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:449-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.