IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v13y2023i3p303-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritisation of key readiness factors to adopt Industry 4.0 in manufacturing organisations using select MCDM approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Rajesh Attri
  • Vikas

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is the utmost substantial matter of concern for manufacturing organisation these days. Every manufacturing organisation's readiness for Industry 4.0 can be measured by a list of necessary factors (known as key readiness factors). Finding the key readiness factors (KRFs) is not the only required task but it is also an extremely important job to prioritise those KRFs because the importance and requirement of KRFs is different for different industries. So, the main objective of this project is to explore and prioritise the KRFs of Industry 4.0 based on certain performance measures, i.e., benefits of adopting Industry 4.0. For this purpose, KRFs and performance measures (benefits) have been explored through literature study and experts' opinions. Afterwards, weightage of performance measures have been computed using fuzzy best worst method. Then, different MCDM approaches namely ORESTE, OCRA, ARAS, and CODAS have been used to prioritise the identified KRFs based on certain performance measures. The obtained results of current work will serve as information bank for the top management of manufacturing organisation to know and deploy the significant KRFs of Industry 4.0 in their implementation strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajesh Attri & Vikas, 2023. "Prioritisation of key readiness factors to adopt Industry 4.0 in manufacturing organisations using select MCDM approaches," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 303-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:303-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129610
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:303-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.