IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v13y2023i1p47-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria decision making and project portfolio management for transport infrastructure investment in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Panasin Chungsawanant
  • Parames Chutima
  • Chaipong Pongpanich

Abstract

Transport project selection is always critical in government planning due to limited resources and diverse demands. Project portfolio management (PPM) was proposed in this study to suggest an optimal set of projects under predetermined constraints. With multiple conflicting criteria, comprehensive steps of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) procedures were proposed in this study. The process begins with a step of pre-screening the projects and selecting the criteria for project evaluation. Sequential steps of: 1) weight determination process using the proportion method; 2) MCDM process using preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) II; 3) constraint consideration process using PROMETHEE V, was proposed to evaluate and select an optimal project portfolio. The study showed that decision making could be successfully done for the transport infrastructure investment with minimal complex calculation steps and questionnaire input from experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Panasin Chungsawanant & Parames Chutima & Chaipong Pongpanich, 2023. "Multi-criteria decision making and project portfolio management for transport infrastructure investment in Thailand," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 47-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:47-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127882
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:47-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.