IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v13y2023i1p127-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma for their application in manufacturing organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Harsimran Singh Sodhi

Abstract

Manufacturing organisations are always on lookout for the best available way to keep control over the scraps and other industrial wastes in order to keep them competitive in the present scenario. Nowadays, there is a matter of discussion among various manufacturing organisations on which waste management technique is better among leading techniques such as lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma. Various experts had recorded their viewpoints in this regard, but still there is confusion in the minds of the practitioners regarding the comparison of these leading techniques. Therefore, in the present study, a systematic comparative analysis of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma has been presented on various basis such as the history and growth of these techniques, important tools and techniques of these techniques, critical success factors, their areas of implementations, etc.; so that practitioners can identify the basic difference among these techniques and can choose the best available technique for implementation in their manufacturing organisations on the basis of the requirement of the situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Harsimran Singh Sodhi, 2023. "A comparative analysis of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma for their application in manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 127-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:127-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127902
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:127-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.