IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v12y2022i6p679-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to improve operational processes using Monte Carlo simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Pereira
  • José Santos
  • Carlos Jerónimo
  • Ricardo Santos

Abstract

The banking industry is changing; the future will integrate disruptive technologies which will make possible to transform their business. Between these transformations, the simulation process is seen as a considerable achievement and increment in the sector of credit request. In this research, a simulation process based in the Monte Carlo method was applied to several credit card requests in order to measure efficiency of credit process based, initially, in a normal distribution and to reproduce several scenarios and choose the one which fits better with the credit process needs. This model aims to identify the main points of deviations and perceive their respective causes. The findings of this study allowed to measure the number of full time equivalent allocated to these processes through the amount of credits requested daily. Throughout the execution of this methodology, it is possible to measure the process with considerable accuracy (AS-IS) and to understand the benefits associated with the implementation of such solution. In the end, the process of credit request has become more effective due to the process optimisation and at the same time, reduced the complexity inherent to the credit card requests.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Pereira & José Santos & Carlos Jerónimo & Ricardo Santos, 2022. "How to improve operational processes using Monte Carlo simulation," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(6), pages 679-694.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:679-694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125845
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:679-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.