IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v12y2022i2p220-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six Sigma method to assess the quality of the service in a gas utility company

Author

Listed:
  • Tomás Fontalvo-Herrea
  • Enrique Delahoz-Dominguez
  • Orianna Fontalvo

Abstract

A method to evaluate the quality of service of a customer service centre is proposed based on Six Sigma, and through an empirical and rational approach that allowed an objective perspective during the development of the study. The quality dimensions that structure the service were identified to consolidate their valuation and to analyse the results in terms of defects per parts per million, sigma level and yield. As a result, it was found that the performance of the service quality dimensions was satisfactory due to the results obtained by all the calculated metrics, obtained an average yield percentage above 97% in the two periods, and all dimensions of quality were above the critical sigma value with a level above 3.43 which shows that the centre provided a satisfactory service process during these periods. Finally, the proposed method associated with the contextualisation of the quality dimensions of the service is significantly innovative and important for the scientific and business community.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomás Fontalvo-Herrea & Enrique Delahoz-Dominguez & Orianna Fontalvo, 2022. "Six Sigma method to assess the quality of the service in a gas utility company," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 220-232.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:220-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121628
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:220-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.