IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v11y2021i5p636-657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a model to assess the organisational readiness for business process reengineering implementation (case study: a manufacturing firm)

Author

Listed:
  • Samaneh Raeesi Nafchi
  • Farid Saeedi
  • Mohammad Reza Fathi

Abstract

Implementing the business process reengineering (BPR) projects needs essential organisational prerequisites. Lacking proper infrastructures and prerequisite cause harmful effects and make the BPR unprofitable. It is suggested to introduce the readiness assessment in order to decrease such risks and measure the company's tendency for BPR implementation. In this research, BPR implementation readiness assessing factors have been extracted from previous researches. The required data is gathered through questionnaires which distributed among 229 BPR, BPM, and quality management experts. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) method was used to evaluate test score validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modelling (SEM) methods and AMOS 18 tested the proposed model and determined the factors importance. Study results show that cultural factors, strategic factors, and project management factors are the most important factors to assess the organisational readiness for BPR implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Samaneh Raeesi Nafchi & Farid Saeedi & Mohammad Reza Fathi, 2021. "Developing a model to assess the organisational readiness for business process reengineering implementation (case study: a manufacturing firm)," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 636-657.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:636-657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:636-657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.