IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v11y2021i1p60-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of perceived support on employee's voice behaviour through the work engagement: a moderator role of locus of control

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Abdullah
  • Iman Ismail
  • Alhamzah Alnoor
  • Esraa Yaqoub

Abstract

This study primarily aimed to identify the direct effect of perceived support on the employees' voice behaviour in the workplace. It examined knowledge interactive impact of locus of control on the perceived support of work engagement. Accordingly, this study was built on literature of voice behaviour and as such, it employed a survey methodology. The study focused on a government sector firm, specifically Basra Electricity Production. The data collection tool used is the questionnaire and it was distributed to 333 employees in the firm. The collected data was analysed using AMOS version 22. Based on the results, work engagement fully mediates the relationship between perceived support and employee voice behaviour, while external locus of control moderated the relationship between perceived support and work engagement. Suggestions were provided for several avenues for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Abdullah & Iman Ismail & Alhamzah Alnoor & Esraa Yaqoub, 2021. "Effect of perceived support on employee's voice behaviour through the work engagement: a moderator role of locus of control," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 60-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:60-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=112253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:60-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.