IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v9y2016i3p328-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining professionalisation in public procurement by ranking practitioner job positions according to job activities

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua M. Steinfeld
  • Clifford McCue
  • Eric Prier

Abstract

Similar to public administration over the last couple of decades, public procurement is trying to define itself as a profession. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a framework for analysing job positions within the occupation of public procurement and to examine the field's potential for professionalisation. The data originates from a survey of public procurement practitioners administered by the Universal Public Procurement Certification Council (UPPCC) that is intended to obtain information with regards to task and knowledge areas. Distinctions can be made between job positions that serve to rank order public procurement practitioners, which may eventually lead to an argument for professionalising the occupation. The job activities performed and managed in perhaps the fastest growing occupation within the public sector are catalogued in this study. Furthermore, practitioner membership to professional associations and attainment of certifications are analysed to test for the advent of professionalisation across job positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua M. Steinfeld & Clifford McCue & Eric Prier, 2016. "Examining professionalisation in public procurement by ranking practitioner job positions according to job activities," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 328-353.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:328-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:328-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.