IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v7y2014i5p596-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-examining procurement tenders with respect to price: a transaction cost model of Portland procurement agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Adam M. Williams

Abstract

Past research has provided a variety of model approaches which are intended for the use of detecting improprieties in the bidding process for public procurement auctions. Recent literature has moved beyond traditional bid price models and seeks to incorporate various non-price factors, such as vendor utility, into bid rigging modelling efforts. In response, the following research aims to incorporate specific non-price factors such as vendor distance to site, vehicles owned, etc., to demonstrate, while using transaction cost economic (TCE) theory, that these complex price models - hedonic price models - can incorporate non-price factors as a function of vendor price mechanisms. Future implications of hedonic techniques in procurement bidding analysis are also discussed with regard to their potential usefulness for detecting collusive behaviour. Data, which contains both bids accused of collusion and competitive bids, were collected and coded to include variables omitted from other OLS models. The hedonic model tested was found to improve upon modelling capabilities of standard OLS models creating possibilities for more extensive research into detailed price modelling focusing on bidding improprieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam M. Williams, 2014. "Re-examining procurement tenders with respect to price: a transaction cost model of Portland procurement agencies," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(5), pages 596-621.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:5:p:596-621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64621
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:5:p:596-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.