IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v7y2014i2p219-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-examining the structure of supplier stratification matrix: a focus on differential value and relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoming Li
  • Festus Olorunniwo
  • Joel Jolayemi
  • Chunxing Fan

Abstract

This paper explores current empirical practice in supplier stratification management, focusing on how suppliers are stratified and how to manage these supplier segments differentially by using common evaluation criteria. Using information gathered through interviews of senior managers of supplier relationship management from 15 companies and extensive literature search, this paper proposes a new framework on supplier stratification that addresses the weakness in existing stratification conceptualisation. A survey was also conducted to evaluate the relative importance placed on different evaluation criteria when evaluating different supplier segments. Factor analysis reveals that all these evaluation criteria are indeed determined by two factors: purchasing value and relationship. Our analyses further show that, for purchasing value: strategic suppliers have the highest value, followed in decreasing order by custom, collaborative, and finally commodity suppliers. For relationship: strategic suppliers are distinctly the most important segment, followed by collaborative and custom suppliers, and finally commodity suppliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoming Li & Festus Olorunniwo & Joel Jolayemi & Chunxing Fan, 2014. "Re-examining the structure of supplier stratification matrix: a focus on differential value and relationship," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 219-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:219-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59558
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:219-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.