IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v7y2014i1p71-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for reducing buyer perceived risk related to the adoption of technological innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Samuli Patala
  • Anne Jalkala
  • Risto Soukka

Abstract

Industrial technology suppliers marketing and selling technological innovations need to be able to reduce buyer perceived risk. Innovation buyers face high perceived risks, especially in the initiation and implementation phases of innovation adoption. We deliver insights on risk reduction tools by examining the case of a monitoring system innovation designed to enhance process efficiency in an electrolytic copper refining process. We examine the case from both the buyer and seller perspective and propose concrete methods that sellers can employ to reduce buyer perceived risk. At the initiation phase, we illustrate a life cycle-based tool for performance assessment. In the implementation phase, we identify three key supplier processes namely adaptation, championing, and cooperative implementation that may facilitate the buying firm's successful implementation of the innovation. The findings provide more in-depth understanding about the role of risk reduction in the marketing and procurement of technological innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuli Patala & Anne Jalkala & Risto Soukka, 2014. "Methods for reducing buyer perceived risk related to the adoption of technological innovations," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 71-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:71-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57868
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Johnsen & Marie-Anne Le Dain & Nadine Kiratli & Holger Schiele, 2022. "Editorial: Purchasing and innovation: Past, present and future of the field of research," Post-Print hal-03761525, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:71-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.