IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v4y2011i3p323-339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilising multicriteria decision making for rewarding participants in collaborative e-procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitra Voulgaridou
  • Vrassidas Leopoulos
  • Konstantinos Kirytopoulos

Abstract

The technological advancements of the new network economy are changing the marketplace and impelling changes in strategic alliances and partnership structures within the e-supply chain (e-SC). E-SC managers need to consider multiple performance characteristics and trade-offs between conflicting tangible and intangible factors in order to evaluate participants. In this context, the authors present a comprehensive methodology for evaluating and rewarding participants in the parapharmaceutical e-SC. The paper consists of three parts. The first one provides a review concerning the criteria and the methods used for partners' evaluation and proposes a framework for selecting the most appropriate decision making approach. The second describes the parapharmaceutical e-procurement processes in Greece, while the third proposes an ANP-based methodology for partners' evaluation. The criteria, which influence the final decision, are presented and the results indicate that the development of a learning climate and the advanced collaboration among partners dominate the decision making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitra Voulgaridou & Vrassidas Leopoulos & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos, 2011. "Utilising multicriteria decision making for rewarding participants in collaborative e-procurement," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 323-339.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:3:p:323-339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:3:p:323-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.