IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v4y2011i2p181-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain success: key initiatives differentiating high- and low-performing firms

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory M. Magnan
  • Amydee M. Fawcett
  • Stanley E. Fawcett

Abstract

Supply chain management (SCM) has emerged as a strategic response to the confluence of increasing global competition and pressure on management to be more productive with capital and assets. Many firms, however, are not realising the full potential of their supply chain initiatives. In this study, 588 firms active in supply chain integration (SCI) were divided into three groups based on overall firm performance. Strategic and tactical differences were observed between those in the high- and low-performing groups. Results indicate that high-performing firms have differentiated their supply chain capabilities in three critical areas: truly focusing on the needs of customers, communicating/sharing information with other supply chain members, and improving internal integration and alignment. Primary activities supporting the initiatives include supportive and engaged senior management, creating performance measures to support integration around customers, and building information architectures that facilitate cross-organisational information sharing. This combination of initiatives and activities separates the firms in the sample, providing insight into how other firms can accelerate their supply chain maturation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory M. Magnan & Amydee M. Fawcett & Stanley E. Fawcett, 2011. "Supply chain success: key initiatives differentiating high- and low-performing firms," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 181-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:181-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38898
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:181-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.