IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v3y2010i3p247-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The myth behind integration in the UK construction industry

Author

Listed:
  • Adekunle Sabitu Oyegoke
  • Peter McDermott
  • Michael Dickinson

Abstract

The overall aim of this study is to ascertain the structure of the UK construction industry, especially the level and form of integration in the UK construction industry. This study utilises theoretical analysis of the concepts and measures of fragmentation, social and economic notions of integration, and trending analysis of the UK construction statistics data which is used to positively correlate the distribution of different sizes of firms, different type of trades and their value of work done between 1995 to 2005 to determine the structure of the industry. The result indicates that: the UK construction industry is not economically integrated because, a) the number and value of work done by the specialist trade firms is increasing in higher proportion than the main trade; b) the strong performance of the medium size firms (MSFs) category support the fact that the industry utilises social integrative devices, for example, collaborative arrangement, framework arrangement, partnering, etc. instead of actual integration (economic) process. The study can serve as learning opportunity for the construction stakeholders by placing stronger emphasise on management system rather than point of performance responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Adekunle Sabitu Oyegoke & Peter McDermott & Michael Dickinson, 2010. "The myth behind integration in the UK construction industry," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 247-264.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:247-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=33444
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:247-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.