IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v3y2010i2p214-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical common weights compromise solution approach for technology selection

Author

Listed:
  • R. Kiani Mavi
  • A. Makui
  • S. Fazli
  • A. Alinezhad

Abstract

Industrial managers are often faced with the dilemma of selecting a single most appropriate technology from a range of competing options. The rapid development of technologies, together with their increasing complexity and variety, has made the task of technology selection difficult. Technology selection and justification involve decision-makings that are critical to the profitability and growth of a company in the increasing competitive global scenario. In many cases, the selection processes are based on generic decision support tools which are not fully adapted for technology selection. In this paper, a practical common weight compromise solution methodology with an improved discriminating power is introduced for selecting the best technology. Robustness and discriminating power of this method in robot evaluation problem is justified. High Spearman's rank correlation between the ranks obtained by this approach and previous approaches justifies the robustness of the approach.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Kiani Mavi & A. Makui & S. Fazli & A. Alinezhad, 2010. "Practical common weights compromise solution approach for technology selection," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 214-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:214-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30736
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:214-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.