IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v26y2026i5p1-23.html

A standardised public procurement data architecture: a framework for tendering-stage analytics and decision support

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulaziz Al-Sulaiti

Abstract

This paper proposes a uniform public procurement data architecture defining minimum mandatory fields, mapping them to the open contracting data standard (OCDS), and linking tender-stage data to analytical outputs and government objectives. A comparative conceptual study examines six ecosystems: the European Union (TED), the UK (Contracts Finder), Singapore (GeBIZ), and three GCC systems (Saudi Arabia's Etimad, Qatar's Monaqasat, and the UAE federal eSourcing portals). Using OCDS as a reference schema, fields were extracted, canonicalised, and mapped across jurisdictions. A conceptual model links data statements to procurement stages, analytical performance, and policy goals. Core identification, timeline, and value fields appear universally, but major gaps remain in supplier identifiers, evaluation scoring, SME or local vendor flags, past performance metrics, and contract implementation data. GeBIZ demonstrates near-complete lifecycle traceability and advanced analytics, whereas EU and UK systems show moderate gaps and GCC platforms provide limited supplier-level and performance information.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulaziz Al-Sulaiti, 2026. "A standardised public procurement data architecture: a framework for tendering-stage analytics and decision support," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(5), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:26:y:2026:i:5:p:1-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=155566
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:26:y:2026:i:5:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.