IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v17y2023i2p204-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Full and open competition in public procurement: a noble lie

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher L. Atkinson
  • Clifford McCue
  • Eric Prier

Abstract

The notion that the US federal government provides equal opportunity for all businesses to potentially receive contracts may be, as discussed in Plato's Republic, a noble lie. In this context, the noble lie represents government's attempt to advance an agenda that is ostensibly in the public interest yet is empirically untrue. Using the 'full and open competition' designation and number of offers as a measure of actual competition for government contracts, this research shows that competitive contracting by the US federal government is more an ideal than actual practice. Based on these findings, it is asserted that full and open competition is consistent with a noble lie, existing as an ideal not regularly attained, but nonetheless offered in service of other ends. Contextualising and linking the noble lie with trust signals areas for future research regarding competition in public procurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher L. Atkinson & Clifford McCue & Eric Prier, 2023. "Full and open competition in public procurement: a noble lie," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(2), pages 204-228.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:204-228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=130744
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:204-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.