IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v14y2021i2p230-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing and explaining a professional ethics model for the managers of the banking industry, using the grounded theory strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Azar Kaffashpoor
  • Mosayeb Samanian
  • Hadi Rahmdel

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design and explain a model of professional ethics for bank managers, and also identifying its dimensions and components. The research strategy used in this study is the grounded theory with a Glaserian (emergent) approach. To collect the data, a semi-structured targeted sampling (using the snowball method) was conducted. Fifteen interviews with bank managers were done to reach a theoretical conclusion. The required data were collected and analysed. After the continuous process of data comparison and selective codifying, the total collected data were classified into 403 primary concepts, 23 categories and three groups. The final result of the collected data analysis led to the final model of research about the core issue, as the 'professional ethics for bank managers'. The bank manages' professional ethics were classified into three dimensions: individual, organisational and cross-organisational. Based on the findings of this study, this model can be considered and used as a guide for organisational and professional ethics for bank managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Azar Kaffashpoor & Mosayeb Samanian & Hadi Rahmdel, 2021. "Designing and explaining a professional ethics model for the managers of the banking industry, using the grounded theory strategy," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 230-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:230-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113499
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:230-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.