IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v12y2019i2p174-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining reasonable bid ratios under two-sided power distribution assumption for public procurement under capped lowest-cost bidding system

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Wibowo

Abstract

This paper proposes a new definition of reasonable bid ratios - a ratio of bid price to published owner cost estimate - under the capped lowest-cost bidding system and provides a closed-form solution to determine the ratios for a given number of bidders. Bid ratios are assumed to be random, obeying two-sided power distribution (TSP). A reasonable bid ratio is found to decrease with increased number of bidders. The Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the computed reasonable bid ratios under the assumption of TSP distribution are proven to be very close to those under beta distribution and those from empirical data and are more accurate than those estimated from triangular distribution. Using Indonesian public procurement as a case study, this paper shows that reasonable bid ratios with uncertain numbers of bidders are lower than the traditional cut-off point. To make the proposed model operational, this paper also presents a simple protocol including the determination of minimum sample size required for TSP approximation. This paper concludes with model limitations and directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Wibowo, 2019. "Determining reasonable bid ratios under two-sided power distribution assumption for public procurement under capped lowest-cost bidding system," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 174-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:174-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=98551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:174-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.