IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v28y2024i1-2p104-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A formal consideration of user tactics during product evaluation in early-stage product development

Author

Listed:
  • Trent Owens
  • Christopher A. Mattson
  • Carl D. Sorensen
  • Michael L. Anderson

Abstract

Frequent and effective design evaluation is foundational to the success of any product development effort. Products used, installed or otherwise handled by humans would benefit from an evaluation of the product while formally considering both the physical embodiment of the technology, termed technology, and the steps a user should take to use that technology, termed tactics. Formal and simultaneous evaluations of both technology and tactics are not widespread in the product design literature. Although informal evaluation methods have advantages, formal methods are also known to be effective. In this paper we propose a formal method for evaluating tactics and technology simultaneously. Unlike the published literature, this evaluation involves explicitly defined tactics in the form of a written description of the actor, environment and series of steps. It also involves the use of stage appropriate, explicitly defined tactics-dependent criteria, which include criteria from a broad range of impact categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Trent Owens & Christopher A. Mattson & Carl D. Sorensen & Michael L. Anderson, 2024. "A formal consideration of user tactics during product evaluation in early-stage product development," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(1/2), pages 104-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:28:y:2024:i:1/2:p:104-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137784
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:28:y:2024:i:1/2:p:104-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.