IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v55y2026i2p247-275.html

Improved managerial decisions for fuzzy stochastic bi-objective linear programming models: a trade-off ratio-based autonomised approach

Author

Listed:
  • Arindam Garai
  • Santanu Saha
  • Kajal De

Abstract

Industry-derived fuzzy stochastic bi-objective linear programming (FSBOLP) models typically focus on a single major objective function. However, mathematical analysis based classical minmax method fails to distinguish between two competing objectives. This sometimes causes Pareto optimal solutions failing to meet with managerial goals. Additionally, to assume that both objectives in a FSBOLP shall attain the same highest standard is unrealistic. To overcome these limitations, the proposed amended minmax model uses the absolute difference operator. This pushes intermediate non-dominated points closer to predefined reference levels, generating more desirable Pareto optimal solutions. Then this study frames one trade-off ratio-based autonomised optimisation algorithm, updating reference levels throughout iterations and reducing the need for frequent manager interactions. A numerical case study validates the effectiveness of proposed approach. This way, this study provides an improved framework for FSBOLP models, addressing the shortcomings of the traditional method and providing better decision-making support for industry managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Arindam Garai & Santanu Saha & Kajal De, 2026. "Improved managerial decisions for fuzzy stochastic bi-objective linear programming models: a trade-off ratio-based autonomised approach," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 55(2), pages 247-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:55:y:2026:i:2:p:247-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=151743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:55:y:2026:i:2:p:247-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.