IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v44y2022i2p171-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An innovative hybrid fuzzy TOPSIS based on design of experiments for multi-criteria supplier evaluation and selection

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Marjani
  • Mohammad Habibi
  • Arash Pazhouhandeh

Abstract

In this article, nine essential criteria are considered to select the best supplier in supply chain risk management. For this purpose, to address the unspecified criteria and the analysis of the results, a mixed approach of fuzzy TOPSIS and design of experiments (DOE) were presented, and a 2k factorial design was used for factor analysis at both low and high levels. Combining the fuzzy TOPSIS and DOE gives the decision-makers more freedom to select because it can analyse the effects of different factors on the response variable by sensitivity analysis and according to different weights. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were calculated for each response variable. The obtained R2 value shows that the model works well with the elimination of effects. A comparison was made to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Besides, to rank the factors based on each response variable, the Pareto chart was used that was very impressive, and the ineffective factors were eliminated. Finally, the ranking results for each decision-maker were compared with Shannon entropy weight modification method and decision-makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Marjani & Mohammad Habibi & Arash Pazhouhandeh, 2022. "An innovative hybrid fuzzy TOPSIS based on design of experiments for multi-criteria supplier evaluation and selection," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 44(2), pages 171-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:171-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=123397
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:171-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.