IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v41y2021i2p168-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bargaining in a closed-loop supply chain with consumer returns

Author

Listed:
  • Yertai Tanai
  • Emmanuel Dechenaux
  • Eddy B. Patuwo
  • Alfred L. Guiffrida

Abstract

The increasing quality of consumer returns creates substantial economic potential for closed-loop supply chains to extract value from returned goods. In this paper, we focus on the supply chain interaction between a retailer and a third party reverse logistics provider (3PRLP) to process consumer returns under a full refund policy. In the model, the retailer orders processed returns from the 3PRLP in exchange for a fee and then resell the processed returns. We compare an uncoordinated supply chain, in which the retailer makes a take-it-or-leave it offer of a fee to the 3PRLP, to a coordinated supply chain, in which the retailer and the 3PRLP jointly decide on the quantity of processed returns and the fee using Nash bargaining. We show that coordination leads to both a higher quantity processed and a higher fee than in the uncoordinated case. We also derive a set of sensitivity results with respect to important parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Yertai Tanai & Emmanuel Dechenaux & Eddy B. Patuwo & Alfred L. Guiffrida, 2021. "Bargaining in a closed-loop supply chain with consumer returns," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(2), pages 168-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:41:y:2021:i:2:p:168-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=115624
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:41:y:2021:i:2:p:168-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.