IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v3y2008i1-2p52-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodological analysis of the normalisation, calibration and linearity of continuous diversity measures

Author

Listed:
  • William Acar
  • Marvin D. Troutt

Abstract

The concepts of concentration and diversity play an important role in several fields of research. The existing indices in use are plagued by three deficiencies. They lack normalisation; they lack calibration; and their nonlinearity causes insufficient discrimination among related but dissimilar situations. After appraising the most common measures in light of these concepts, the paper shows how extant indices could be normalised and calibrated. In addition, we outline the general criteria for future diversity measures, and construct an intrinsically normalised, calibrated and linear one. A theoretical derivation is provided and a number of arguments and illustrative examples are included. We also discuss the limitations of continuous indices, including ours, and proffer some useful caveats.

Suggested Citation

  • William Acar & Marvin D. Troutt, 2008. "A methodological analysis of the normalisation, calibration and linearity of continuous diversity measures," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2), pages 52-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:3:y:2008:i:1/2:p:52-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=16154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Glenn Baigent & William Acar, 2015. "On the economic significance of the benchmark portfolio," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 3(6), pages 16-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:3:y:2008:i:1/2:p:52-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.