IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v39y2020i2p160-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-level stochastic project cost and duration planning methodology integrating earned duration, schedule and value, criticality, cruciality and downside risk metrics

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Wood

Abstract

A high-level methodology is described to integrate deterministic and stochastic calculations of project networks with parallel pathways of work items. It provides the systematic integration of earned value, earned schedule and earned duration metrics and derivative to-completion forecasts of project cost and duration with stochastically-derived quantitative measures of criticality, cruciality, uncertainty and downside risk measures at project, work item and budget levels. A project network consisting of up to about 50 high-level project work items (rather than hundreds of activities) is evaluated applying critical path analysis using a matrix template that derives the fraction of the project completed at regular intervals (e.g., 2% to 5%) along a baseline planned project schedule – the work-progress-breakdown diagram. This matrix is evaluated for each deterministic and stochastic case providing the key information to derive a spectrum established and novel earned value metrics, and to quantify uncertainty, down-side risk and criticality at the work-item, pathway and project levels.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Wood, 2020. "High-level stochastic project cost and duration planning methodology integrating earned duration, schedule and value, criticality, cruciality and downside risk metrics," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 39(2), pages 160-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:39:y:2020:i:2:p:160-204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:39:y:2020:i:2:p:160-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.