IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v36y2019i2p209-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multiple-criteria decision analysis for criticality of boiler tube failures in interval type-2 fuzzy environment

Author

Listed:
  • Ashoke Kumar Bera
  • Dipak Kumar Jana

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-factor decision-making approach for prioritising criticality of failure modes as an alternative to traditional approach of failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA). A review of the literature reveals that although a number of studies have been done on these issues, but none of them have explicitly studied the variations in expert's opinion (intra-personal uncertainty) and the variations in the understanding among experts (inter-personal uncertainty) together. To deal with this problem, this literature proposes a new fuzzy FMECA approach based on IT2 fuzzy sets, which has the ability to capture both intra-personal and inter-personal uncertainty. This approach introduces a more accurate representation of the aggregated data by presenting variations among the individual judgements into type-2 fuzzy numbers, allowing suitable weights for each risk factor by decision makers and thereby developing a flexibility for analysis. The proposed method is applied to evaluate the criticality of different failure modes of boiler tubes of a coal-fired thermal power plants. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets with signed distances, a multi criteria decision-making tool, is used to evaluate the criticalities of the different failure modes (alternatives) of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashoke Kumar Bera & Dipak Kumar Jana, 2019. "A multiple-criteria decision analysis for criticality of boiler tube failures in interval type-2 fuzzy environment," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(2), pages 209-231.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:209-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=102411
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:209-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.