IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v35y2019i2p245-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferable Pareto optimal solutions for specified key objective functions to multiple objective linear programming problems using trade-off ratios under fuzzy environment: an iterative process

Author

Listed:
  • Arindam Garai
  • Palash Mandal
  • Tapan Kumar Roy

Abstract

In this paper, one general iterative process is proposed for obtaining preferable Pareto optimal solutions, based on specified key objective functions, to multiple objective linear programming problems under fuzzy environment. In reality, decision maker usually specifies one key objective function to such problems. But there are known disadvantages in applying existing fuzzy optimisation techniques, in which weights, utility functions etc. are used; whereas in other techniques, none of the objective functions can be specified effectively as key objective function. Moreover, correlation between key objective function and other objective functions may not be exactly known to the decision maker. In existing interactive fuzzy optimisation techniques, initially developed by Sakawa et al. (1984), all such reference levels of fuzzy objective functions are taken as unity. But we may find it unrealistic to expect each of conflicting objective functions to attain individual goals simultaneously. In this paper, we propose to employ trade-off ratios of membership functions of fuzzy objective functions to determine corresponding reference membership levels analytically and develop one iterative process to find preferable Pareto optimal solutions under fuzzy environment. Numerical examples further illustrate our proposed iterative process. Finally conclusions are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Arindam Garai & Palash Mandal & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2019. "Preferable Pareto optimal solutions for specified key objective functions to multiple objective linear programming problems using trade-off ratios under fuzzy environment: an iterative process," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(2), pages 245-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:35:y:2019:i:2:p:245-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100727
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:35:y:2019:i:2:p:245-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.