IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v34y2019i4p524-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A heuristics approach for computing the largest eigenvalue of a pairwise comparison matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Nachiappan Subramanian
  • Ramakrishnan Ramanathan

Abstract

Pairwise comparison matrices (PCMs) are widely used to capture subjective human judgements, especially in the context of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Consistency of judgements is normally computed in the AHP context in the form of consistency ratio (CR), which requires estimation of the largest eigenvalue (λmax) of PCMs. Since many of these alternatives methods do not require calculation of eigenvector, λmax and hence the CR of a PCM cannot be easily estimated. We propose in this paper a simple heuristics for calculating λmax without any need to use eigenvector method (EM). We illustrated the proposed procedure with larger size matrices. Simulation is used to compare the accuracy of the proposed heuristics procedure with actual λmax for PCMs of various sizes. It has been found that the proposed heuristics is highly accurate, with errors less than 1%. The proposed procedure would avoid biases and help managers to make better decisions. The advantage of the proposed heuristics is that it can be easily calculated with simple calculations without any need for specialised mathematical procedures or software and is independent of the method used to derive priorities from PCMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nachiappan Subramanian & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2019. "A heuristics approach for computing the largest eigenvalue of a pairwise comparison matrix," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(4), pages 524-541.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:34:y:2019:i:4:p:524-541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:34:y:2019:i:4:p:524-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.