IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v33y2018i4p512-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different hydraulic analysis conditions for sewer network design optimisation problem using three different evolutionary algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Ramtin Moeini

Abstract

In this paper, the efficiency of considering the constant and varying Manning coefficient for a hydraulic analysis model on the optimal solution of sewer network design optimisation problem is studied. To solve sewer network design optimisation problem, here, different formulations are proposed using genetic algorithm, discreet and continues ant colony optimisation algorithms. In all proposed formulations, the nodal cover depths of the sewer network are taken as decision variables of the problem. Furthermore, for both ant-based algorithms two different formulations are proposed using unconstrained and constrained versions of these algorithms. The constrained versions of these algorithms are proposed here for the explicit satisfaction of the minimum pipe slope constraint leading to smaller search space. Two benchmark test examples are solved here using proposed formulations and the results are presented and compared with other available results. Comparison of the results shows the superiority of considering varying Manning coefficient condition for hydraulic analysis model. Furthermore, the results show the superiority of continues ant colony optimisation algorithm and especially the constrained version of it to optimally solve the sewer network design optimisation problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramtin Moeini, 2018. "Different hydraulic analysis conditions for sewer network design optimisation problem using three different evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 512-537.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:33:y:2018:i:4:p:512-537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=96490
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:33:y:2018:i:4:p:512-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.