IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v33y2018i3p367-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare waste management practices' identification and evaluation to rank hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Ankur Chauhan
  • Amol Singh
  • Sanjay Jharkharia

Abstract

In the present study, various criteria (practices) have been identified from the literature of healthcare waste management. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been applied to compute the weights of these criteria. The weight of a criterion shows its significance for healthcare waste management. Furthermore, the weights of criteria have been used as an input to Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), for ranking six alternatives (hospitals) to demonstrate the assessment methodology in real time. The literary contribution of this work is the identification of HCWM practices, which can be very useful in the assessment of the hospital's waste management planning, shown by the case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankur Chauhan & Amol Singh & Sanjay Jharkharia, 2018. "Healthcare waste management practices' identification and evaluation to rank hospitals," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(3), pages 367-386.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:33:y:2018:i:3:p:367-386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimir Simic & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh & Abtin Ijadi Maghsoodi, 2023. "Locating a disinfection facility for hazardous healthcare waste in the COVID-19 era: a novel approach based on Fermatean fuzzy ITARA-MARCOS and random forest recursive feature elimination algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 1105-1150, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:33:y:2018:i:3:p:367-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.