IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v32y2018i3p350-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the benefits of the lean thinking adoption by the beer game supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Pozzi
  • Fernanda Strozzi
  • Tommaso Rossi
  • Carlo Noè

Abstract

Benefits obtained by the adoption of lean thinking are often declared in the literature but not measured both at local and global level. In this work, the benefits quantification of an adoption of a lean thinking order policy is measured in the case of beer game supply chain modelled by Thomsen et al. (1992) considering the impact on bullwhip effect and inventory both on a supply chain level and on a single stage level. The paper shows that lean thinking provides major benefits to the whole supply chain in terms of bullwhip effect and carried inventory if more and more levels apply it. On the other hand, the paper highlights that these benefits not always hold locally, i.e., for some levels can be more profitable when no levels apply an order policy lean thinking-based.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Pozzi & Fernanda Strozzi & Tommaso Rossi & Carlo Noè, 2018. "Quantifying the benefits of the lean thinking adoption by the beer game supply chain," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(3), pages 350-363.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:350-363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92739
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:350-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.