IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v30y2017i1p99-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing order review and release mechanisms to improve flow time: a multi-method approach

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas N. Hales
  • Satya S. Chakravorty

Abstract

For decades, various improvements in shop floor performance due to work load control (WLC) and order review and release (ORR) systems have been reported. The majority of these studies rely only on computer simulation to demonstrate their benefits, which typically include minimising resource idleness or order tardiness, among others. However, the vast majority of these studies do not test these mechanisms in real-world shops, thus limiting the research in this area. Using the 'theory-practice iterative cycle', this study employs a combination of case study, computer simulation, and action-research to develop and empirically test a new ORR mechanism that improves mean system flow time (MST) through shortest setups (SSU). This is important because extant simulation studies do not support the proposition that ORR improves MST. The SSU mechanism led to improvements in MST of 25% in simulation studies and 7% in a real-world firm, among other benefits. Additionally, we discuss a number of issues related to field research in ORR that may benefit researchers working on completing the theory-practice cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas N. Hales & Satya S. Chakravorty, 2017. "Testing order review and release mechanisms to improve flow time: a multi-method approach," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 99-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:99-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85964
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:30:y:2017:i:1:p:99-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.